« exit wound in a foreign nation |
Main
| 1d8-2 geek points »
January 09, 2004
my skin so tight it screams
I have kept political stories "off the table" for several months . . . but today I read an article at K5 called What Good Is The Bill of Rights?
Read on, but be warned: this is a seriously long-winded political rant.
Some tactics in The War On Terror are upsetting, like the laughably mis-named "free speech zones dissenters are being forced into when Mr. Bush comes to town.
Some of the tactics in The War On Terror are just plain stupid, like the FBI's warning to be on the lookout for people reading the Old Farmer's Almanac.
Some of the tactics in The War On Terror are incredibly invasive, like Ashcroft's demand that every single hotel in Las Vegas give the FBI intimate details about their hotel guests, and the sneaky passage of several Patriot II laws with one hand while the other waved a victorious "We caught Saddam!" flag to distract the American Public.
I've read these stories over the last several months, and traded outrage for resignation. I even gave up writing about them here, because I got tired of people attacking me for being "Un-American." (I believe that the transformation of patriotism into jingoism, and its use as an election-year wedge issue will be one of Karl Rove's greatest and most destructive legacies.)
But in this K5 story was a link to the incredibly horrifying experience of Maher Arar.
This new tactic in The War On Terror left me feeling physically ill:
Maher Arar was about to change planes on his way home to Canada after visiting his wife's family in Tunisia when he was pulled aside for questioning. He was not a terrorist. He had no terrorist connections, but his name was on the list, so he was detained for questioning. Not ordinary, polite questioning, but abusive, insulting, degrading questioning by the immigration service, the FBI and the New York City Police Department.
He asked for a lawyer and was told he could not have one. He asked to call his family, but phone calls were not permitted. Instead, he was clapped into shackles and, for several days, made to "disappear." His family was frantic.
Finally, he was allowed to make a call. His government expected that Arar's right of safe passage under its passport would be respected. But it wasn't. Arar denied any connection to terrorists. He was not accused of any crimes, but U.S. agents wanted him questioned further by someone whose methods might be more persuasive than theirs.
So, they put Arar on a private plane and flew him to Washington, D.C. There, a new team, presumably from the CIA, took over and delivered him, by way of Jordan, to Syrian interrogators. This covert operation was legal, our Justice Department later claimed, because Arar is also a citizen of Syria by birth. The fact that he was a Canadian traveling on a Canadian passport, with a wife, two children and job in Canada, and had not lived in Syria for 16 years, was ignored. The Justice Department wanted him to be questioned by Syrian military intelligence, whose interrogation methods our government has repeatedly condemned.
The Syrians locked Arar in an underground cell the size of a grave: 3 feet wide, 6 feet long, 7 feet high. Then they questioned him, under torture, repeatedly, for 10 months. Finally, when it was obvious that their prisoner had no terrorist ties, they let him go, 40 pounds lighter, with a pronounced limp and chronic nightmares.
[. . .]
Our intelligence agencies have a name for this torture-by-proxy. They call it "extraordinary rendition." As one intelligence official explained: "We don't kick the s -- out of them. We send them to other countries so they can kick the s -- out of them."
This secret program for torturing suspects has been authorized, if that is the right word for it, by a secret presidential finding. Where the president gets the authority to have anyone tortured has never been explained.
There's much more in the article, and it's required reading for anyone, regardless of political ideology, who believes in the principles upon which America was founded.
The screaming-heads on talk radio like to remind us that "as long as you're not doing anything wrong, you don't have anything to fear."
Well.
Maher Arar wasn't doing anything wrong. He was getting on a plane to go home to his family. I'd say he had quite a bit to fear.
When did this happen? Is this that great Freedom we're always told The Terrorists hate? If the government will take this man and ship him off to Syria -- SYRIA! -- to be tortured, on the flimsiest of evidence . . . what else will they do?
When do we say enough!? When do we finally stand up to Mr. Bush, Mr. Ashcroft, and the rest and tell them, "No! This is not how we do things in the United States of America!"
Will we wait until our doors are kicked in because one of our suspicious-yet-patriotic neighbors reported us to some secret government agency? Will it be when your husband "disappears" during a business trip, and surfaces at Guantanamo Bay four months later? What does it take, America!?
We've heard over and over again from supporters of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as supporters of Mr. Bush's foreign policies that we must stop terrorists from taking away our American Way Of Life. "They hate us because of our Freedom," Mr. Bush is fond of saying.
So is this a new tactic in Mr. Bush's War on Terror? Maybe if we just give our freedoms away -- our right to privacy, our right to peaceably assemble, our right to dissent -- to the likes of John Ashcroft . . . if we allow our Congress and Supreme Court to abandon their constitutional responsibilities to check and balance the Executive branch . . . if we sit idly by while The American Enterprise Institute and the Project for the New American Century seize the reins of American power . . . if we allow the basic rights upon which America was founded to be slowly but steadily eroded, if we allow the very things that set America apart from the so-called "Axis of Evil" to be taken away . . . maybe then The Terrorists won't have anything left to hate.
I realize that some who read this will simply dismiss it (and me) as the idiot rantings of a "Hollywood Liberal" who hates George W. Bush, but that misses the point: I never thought I'd live long enough to see the day when my government sent someone off to be tortured by a foreign country, and it happened on Mr. Bush's watch.
(Comments are temporarily disabled while we do some upgrades, but should return in 24 or 48 hours)
Posted by wil at January 9, 2004 06:48 PM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.wilwheaton.net/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/408
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference my skin so tight it screams:
» Pot vs Kettle: No agreement on color from TankGrrl - Annotations On Life
The Republicans are crowing about Bush being compared to Hitler. Fair enough. Hitler was about as bad as they come on the Evildoers scale. Of course, the Pubs don't mind when any Democrats or Libertarians are called the same by persons from their party... [Read More]
Tracked on January 9, 2004 07:16 PM
» k5 has the better story from Medicated Dad
WIL WHEATON DOT NET: my skin so tight it screams Wil ranting about an article on k5. I actually prefer the article on k5. Why? It remembers that it's not just the Bushies we need to worry about; don't forget... [Read More]
Tracked on January 9, 2004 07:55 PM
» Politics why I hate them. from beth
Politics are an evil invention by man. I realize they are important for multiple reasons but that does not mean I have to like them. I count my blessings that I live in the US. However, even that is not 100% great. There is so much that our governm... [Read More]
Tracked on January 9, 2004 08:06 PM
» Is it possible to renounce one's citizenship? from Tomorrow's News
It's gone too far, it went too far over a year ago. Wil posted a nice rant sparked off by... [Read More]
Tracked on January 10, 2004 02:39 AM
» CNN from The North Carolina Experiment
I wrote a heated email to CNN the other day when they quoted Pecanwombat and BLARRRGH, two anonymous users on some forum about Britney Spears, where I condemned what I saw as setting a really terrible precedent for national news... [Read More]
Tracked on January 10, 2004 07:51 AM
» In Search of Freedom from In Search of Utopia
To be honest, as sacrilegious as it may sound, I stopped reading Wil Wheaton's Blog a while back. While reading Wil's Blog was one of the reason's I got into Blogging, I just wasn't, "feeling," him any more. I have discovered so many interesting "Reg... [Read More]
Tracked on January 10, 2004 12:18 PM
» Takin' the high road from Snowpoint
Wil has posted a fairly rare rant about an article at kuro5shin. So how much do we simply ignore, and how much do we justify? Is it appropriate to allow a few abrogations of civil rights, or should we be... [Read More]
Tracked on January 10, 2004 01:39 PM
» wil comes back to america from meta-roj blog
it's so nice to see someone that is a bit articulate inspired to take up the pen (as it were) again and get back into the discussion about america. i've been slow to dig up the material (being on the... [Read More]
Tracked on January 10, 2004 09:01 PM
» What Free Speech? from Grumpy Times
The First Amendment: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to [Read More]
Tracked on January 11, 2004 08:33 PM
» Go Away USA from mavrinac.com
Scary. The U.S. border is closer to my house than the nearest gas station, and the War on Terror is escalating. I said to one of my friends years ago, before Iraq 2.0, before 9/11, that I could see George... [Read More]
Tracked on January 11, 2004 08:48 PM
» Putting it all together from Marc's terminal
I'd been thinking about how to wite up something that summed up a lot of the recent news about the FBI's expanded powers but had not summed up the will yet. Today I see that Wil Wheaton has written a... [Read More]
Tracked on January 11, 2004 11:44 PM
» LIES! heh, I almost made a funny title in manner of Al Franken from upsoclose
Wil Wheaton, well, he rocks, and he's been writing some good stuff about politics as of late.
First, he wrote about the Bill of Rights, and referred his readers to this editorial about "free speech zones" that Bush uses when he travels to ... [Read More]
Tracked on January 14, 2004 08:25 AM
» Wil Wheaton against the MAN. from Somebody was here, you just missed him.
I don't care what anybody says about "Hollywood types". Wil is so not a "Hollywood type". "Hollywood types" care very little about anything but their next paycheck. They are shallow and only give their time and money when it suits... [Read More]
Tracked on January 17, 2004 07:56 PM
» the opposition platform from meta-roj blog
some words below have been changed to make this more interesting. the original, unedited text is below the cut. links are, of course, mine, picked at random from the vast expanse of the world wide web. i tried to find... [Read More]
Tracked on May 21, 2004 12:12 PM
» the opposition platform from meta-roj blog
some words below have been changed to make this more interesting. the original, unedited text is below the cut. links are, of course, mine, picked at random from the vast expanse of the world wide web. i tried to find... [Read More]
Tracked on May 21, 2004 12:18 PM