| ||||||||||||||||||
|
« Comments from the wife, version 3.0 | Main | experience the warmth » February 13, 2004jukebox breakdownGoogle News has this nifty feature that lets you subscribe to news alerts. You tell Google what to watch for, and when those key words are found, it will send you an e-mail alert. I use it to watch for "Jenna Jameson declares love for Wil Wheaton." While it hasn't found that particular story just yet, it lets me know when my name appears on one of the news sources Google crawls. A few days ago, I got a Google News alert that linked me to an article called "Wil Wheaton is a Dick" that was posted to Alternet. The article, as it turns out, has little to do with whether I'm a dick or not, and has much more to do with how annoying Orkut is. However, being called a dick in a major publication stung a bit (actually, it stung a LOT) so I sent an e-mail to the article's author:
Here's my entire Orkut profile thingy:
Honestly, I'm not all that interested in "hanging out" or "meeting people" . . . I'm more concerned that some jackass will pretend to be me on this service, and then I'd have to break some legs. But I'd sing a nice song while I did it, because, at heart, I'm a really nice guy. Practically, this means I probably won't add many people as friends. It's nothing personal. It just means that I'm a dick. I fully expected to get another Google News alert, linking me to a story called "Wil Wheaton is a Crybaby with No Sense of Humor" but I got an e-mail instead:
I think the main thrust of her article is dead-on: I hate those social networking things, and I especially hate how Orkut doesn't offer a "leave me alone, I don't want to play with your football" opt-out option in the tons of e-mails they send invitees. And the way people take it personally when they're not added as friends? It's like someone showed up unannounced at your house, and then got pissed when you didn't invite them in for dinner. It's like grade school: "Do you like me check []YES or []NO and write back okay? Stay Sweet and Smile Sexy, Surfer Style!" And there's no easy way to get out of it, as far as I can tell. I wasted lots of time trying to find some "leave me alone" option in the profile thingy, but I couldn't find it. Eventually, I found that I have to send an e-mail to the admin, and tell them to delete my account. Seems sort of like the Simpsons: [Spotlight clicks on as a eerily soothing voice says:] "Uh, you're free to leave at any time . . . but we'd just like to know why." In retrospect, I guess I'm flattered that I made it into any headline, and I suppose there's something to be said about how there is no such thing as bad publicity. Maybe if I'd been in the clutches of a laughing jag when I got the news alert, I would have immediately seen the humor that I now see is clearly there. Maybe I'm just a big pussy who needs to get two for flinching. But I thought it was really cool of Annalee to write me back. I didn't think she would, and I certainly didn't think she'd apologize. If we were members of some online social networking thing, I'd totally want to be her friend, and I'd give her five smiley faces, five stars, and three unicorns. Trackback Pings TrackBack URL for this entry: Listed below are links to weblogs that reference jukebox breakdown: » Wil Weaton is a Dick (not really) from Just Playing » Using the web for good... from a life less interesting » More orkut from Phildo's Blog » Wil Wheaton Interview: First Draft from H121: Blogging Basics with Movable Type Comments
My William, a dick? Never! ..Okay, so maybe not never. Still, I would think she could have emailed you making sure it was cool first. But with a response like she gave, it might be a little hard to get mad. Posted by: jon at February 13, 2004 12:38 PMYeah, that's an unfortunate thing... her not thinking of how that would translate. I think it was ignorant of her, but I think you handled it the right way. Certainly her intentions were good but her carry-through was bad. Posted by: Almost Lucid at February 13, 2004 12:44 PMI think most of us would get classed as dicks then... hey if someone I dont know expects to instantly be my friend, then they have another thing coming... friendship is earned... Doesnt matter if you are a celeb or a geek, or both... On-line / off-line... doesnt matter. So I guess according to that article...we are all dicks. Posted by: Brian at February 13, 2004 12:45 PM"Well, I don't know you, so you're not my friend. No harm no foul." That's the bottom line. I guess this kind of confusion might come about because, if you read a person's blog over a period of time, it's quite easy to end up mistakenly feeling that you *do* know that person...if you see what I mean. Anyway - it's cool that you sorted it out between the two of you. Posted by: Paul at February 13, 2004 01:22 PMI think she was being nice to you, dude. She wrote a funny column that kept you in the limelight, and I think the story comes through for what it is. It's not spiteful. Now, her next article, "Wil Wheaton is a scum-sucking leech on America, and should be deported to Camarillo," that will be spiteful. Posted by: JRM at February 13, 2004 01:25 PMI have to say, that letter to her was extremely poised. I've heard enough celebs spout off to detractors to get a good laugh out of those, and then *really* think the celeb is a dick. That was just a very sincere, well-intended, well-written letter. Nice job. And she seems like a sincere person as well. Two intelligent, rational people on the net, woo hoo! And you're right in the end...no such thing as bad publicity. Even Michael Jackson is still selling albums. Posted by: Lisa at February 13, 2004 01:29 PMIf Wil is a dick, we all must be dicks, but since Wil is not a dick any artical or person's claiming he is dick should be shot, or learn to do research and possably check out the facts beforehand. This way no feeling are hurt, and the possability of future jobs are still there. Posted by: Terry at February 13, 2004 01:31 PMOf course you realize that by linking to that story you're raising its Google ranking and making it more likely to rise to the top. Posted by: Mike C at February 13, 2004 01:35 PMIt's hard to not take things too seriously. I even sometimes find myself getting annoyed at someone who is taking me too seriously, then they point out that they were kidding too. I guess it is often ourselves that we take too seriously. I guess the key is to laugh at everything, especially yourself. Posted by: Brent at February 13, 2004 01:44 PMagh, I've already had to say "no" to one person who wanted to said I was his friend. I felt bad, but I didn't even know that person. Posted by: belinda at February 13, 2004 01:56 PMWil, I think several people have already made the point that you handled this well. One thought about your mention of setting up a profile on Orkut so that someone else wouldn't do it pretending to be you: why not add something like a "member list" to your about page. You could just say something to the effect of 'here are the communities/sites/groups of which I am a member or regularly post' that way if someone goes to lame-popularity-contest.com and sets up a fake user name pretending to be you, you can at least point back to the list and say, "sorry, but it's not me." Certainly trying to sign up and register at all the popular sites where someone might sign up as an imposter Wil would be a full time job in itself. Just my little suggestion (a.k.a. free advice, it's worth every penny.) Posted by: punxking at February 13, 2004 02:07 PMAs a Dick, I would like to state on behalf of other Dicks that we vehemently object to the usage of our name in reference to a male human body part, or, even worse, to reference anything having to do with WWdN. Wil, surely as a potential Willy (just add two letters) you must understand the pain of being a Dick, a Peter or a Willy. I'm still suffering from the withdrawal of the Janet Jackson class-action boob lawsuit, and I am now further tormented by this nasty development. My victimhood knows no bounds... Just kidding! Hey, Wil! Where's the sappy Valentine's Day material describing intimate details of your conjugal bliss? I hope you have some left in you still after that wild Family Guy DVD and eating crackers in bed weekend? Also, hey, good job of standing up for your self. Nothing better than a Dick standing up, right? I'm surprised you took the article so seriously. After reading the first few paragraphs of the article it seemed obvious that it wasn't meant to be a personal attack. I mean, you called yourself a "dick" and she was just playing along. But considering all the crap you've dealt with over the years with the whole 'Welsley Crusher' thing, I guess I understand why you reacted the way you did. But I gotta tell you man, your email to the author could have backfired big time, you made yourself so vulnerable with the... "You really hurt my feelings" line. Anyway, I'm glad everything worked on. But I feel kind of bummed out after trying to join that Orkut site only to discover I have to be invited into the community. Posted by: Haasim Mahanaim at February 13, 2004 02:25 PMI really like Annalee. I've had the pleasure of hanging out with her after a Creative Commons party up in the city and she randomly mentioned my brother-in-law (pretty accurately to boot) in an article for SF Bay Guardian. http://www.sfbg.com/38/01/x_techsploitation.html Posted by: Beatrice M at February 13, 2004 02:32 PMI don't wanna sound queer or nuthin', but I think that Unicorns are kickass. ~j What's wrong with dicks? I like dicks. I like Wil. Posted by: Kroeme at February 13, 2004 02:42 PMI DO want to sound queer, but unicorns do nothing for me at all. Seriously, she made a very gracious apology. I thought that was pretty cool. Wil, I certainly don't think you're a dick, or a pussy either [long digression about how genitalia terms are disses, and why should they be? deleted here], but I have to admit I was a little surprised by your reaction. If there were 800 websites devoted to dissing you, that would mean that there are 800 people (probably 80% guys) who are mad because 8 MILLION people think you're the best thing since Russel Stover Low Carb Chocolates (my current fave). People don't publicly dis what's otherwise widely ignored ("Sly-Mee brand Liver-Flavored Seaweed Crackers are the Tool Of The Devil!!!"), only what's widely popular. You're a geek saint. The anti-geeks will dis you for real (unlike the author of this article, who clearly had no bad intent). GLORY IN IT. Posted by: Xopher at February 13, 2004 03:00 PMwell, your first name IS Richard, ain't it? Well Wil, you may be a Dick but you're our Dick and we love and your blog and I'm stopping this now before any more homoeroticism creeps on. Posted by: Geoff at February 13, 2004 04:48 PMHow I laughed. First at her article and then, even more, at your initial reaction. I can't believe YOU out of all people were hurt by that article (in fact I first thought you were kidding) *laughs*. Oh well, two for flinching *shrugs*. You're still cool ;-)! XXX Posted by: Sabrina at February 13, 2004 06:20 PMOn second thought ... I have just re-read your letter to Annalee and your paragraph "I can't tell you how much your story is going to hurt my ability to get work during this pilot season ..." made me understand why the article p*** you off so much that you couldn't see past the headline at first. Man, Hollywood sucks. *depressed* Posted by: Sabrina at February 13, 2004 06:36 PMDoes it make me a bad monkey if I giggled a little bit at the hidden pun in all of this... Wil.. err.. Richard.. err...??? HMIC? err.. Mr.Wheaton sir? *giggles uncontrollably* sorry.. Posted by: Neph at February 13, 2004 07:30 PMThat chick/dude sounds like a crybaby to me. Posted by: Veronica at February 13, 2004 07:31 PMhow in the world could you be expected to be everybody's friend...there's not enough time in the day...i have no idea how many bazillion e-mails you get asking you for something...but i bet it's alot...and if you tried to fulfill all these request s you'd be broke...and living in a trailer down by the river...you may be a dick all i know...all i know i know of you is what i've seen on television...movies and here at WWDN...but saying no to this womans request doesn't make you one. Posted by: d. burr at February 13, 2004 09:04 PMHey Will. You probably know this, but, you don't have to use your webhost to handle your mail. Just set your MX to somewhere that will give you the power of procmail, and you'll be set. You could even run your own MX off of whatever spiffy net connection you have there at Ches Wheaton. Posted by: Darthgeek at February 13, 2004 09:34 PMYou don't know me, but you MUST all be my best friend or you are dicks...you will all be dicks forthwith. Oh, by the way, I'm a first time poster. Have a fantastic day. Posted by: Luke at February 14, 2004 01:44 AMYeah Wil, even though we all adore you, you do get 2 for flinching. You do have some valid reasons for feeling like she was "attacking you", the spirit of the article was lighthearted in nature. Having had to deal with numerous flames and other impunities, I remember the words of Andre Linoge from Storm of the Century, "Give me what I want and I'll go away." Either no response or a response to satiate the detractor's ego/dementia/whatevertheheck is usually enough placation. However, I would love to have seen you give her a wedgie. Posted by: Richard Cranium at February 14, 2004 08:42 AMOh yeah, you still get 5 stars and 6 unicorns just because you had to deal with leeches. Posted by: Richard Cranium at February 14, 2004 08:44 AMOk, so I've never seen one of these networking thingies. However, given the reported behavior (you can be invited by someone else, which puts your e-mail into their database) is there any reason to believe that these sites aren't a giant front-end for a Spam bot? Huh? "How do I know the past isn't a fiction designed to account for the discrepancies between my immediate physical sensations and my state of mind?" It seems to me that no one can really understand the experience of national exposure for many years w/o living it. That said, I have no clue what the appropriate response for Wil would be, being a relatively unknown citizen and not subject to surreal pronouncements on a national scale. I'm usually called a dick by my immediate circle of people and, usually, it's meant in jest. If someone I didn't know called me one in a column read by gawd knows how many people, I'd probably feel a bit twisted by it too. So, nice handling, Wil. Posted by: jonez at February 14, 2004 12:12 PMDude, small world. Annalee Newitz writes for the same newspaper I do (in a different branch, but still). I was surprised to see her name in your blog. Apparently the number of fangirls you have in the bay area is higher than I thought ;). Posted by: jezebel at February 14, 2004 02:05 PMThis is all about that leech scene from Stand By Me, isn't it? Heh. Posted by: Anon at February 14, 2004 03:03 PMEven though it seems to have been a misunderstaning I think you handled it really well. And as for Wesley, TNG would not have been as good without him. Posted by: Bronzeman at February 14, 2004 06:13 PMWay to go Wil! Good save Annalee! Dear Will; Just as a data point, I never for a moment, reading the article, thought that it was really calling you a dick. It was immediately clear to me that she was using your joking self-description as a handle by which to describe the evil that is Orkut. I say this not to wave and go, "Oooh, I'm SMAAAAAAAAAAAART!" but to put your mind a bit more at ease that the article doesn't, in fact, smear your reputation with the casual reader. Posted by: Leviathan at February 15, 2004 04:23 AMI don't get it. You expose yourself to the internet, and join something like orkut, and call yourself a dick, and are shocked someone took a light hearted rib at you. The whole "it might hurt my chances at a pilot" thing shocked me. Not to be mean, but cry me a river, eh. Seriously dude. I am so not buying the Wil Wheaton Tshirt now... Posted by: Mike at February 15, 2004 04:47 AMI will still buy the Wil Wheaton T-shirt. Posted by: Jessa at February 15, 2004 05:04 AMWil, We could offset the bad press by writing more articles, titled "Wil Wheaton is not a dick". -OR- "Wil Wheaton - in demand all over Hollywood" Jenna Jameson declares love for Wil Wheaton Heh, I wasn't even inflammatory and my post was changed to something I totally didn't say. Now when I go try to get a job as an IT professional, search engines are going to show me yearning for a Wil T-Shirt. Your killing my career, man... Posted by: Mike Again at February 15, 2004 02:56 PMWhat a whiney toad! "Oh Oh, not EVERYONE wants to be my friend, even though I've only sent them a messege - ONCE." (more whining) Talk about being over sensitive. Oh well, can't keep every loon in a cage these days... Toads Suck. Drive on. Posted by: farmkey at February 16, 2004 08:51 AMI thought it was a clever article and obviously a joke. Wilhatesme@techsploitation.com was great. Posted by: AndrewD at February 16, 2004 11:09 AMFWIW, that Simpsons scene is a Scientology dig, as is much of the episode. Odd, considering that one of the principal voice actors is a Scientologist. Posted by: Bitt Faulk at February 16, 2004 12:36 PMWow...you must have been in one helluva bad mood to miss the witticism (not to mention the love) in this article. From the looks of some of these comments, some of your readers still don't get the joke. Heh. Posted by: chiavagina at February 16, 2004 01:39 PMThird party readers read both people (PEOPLE!) come full circle to complete and resolve stories of hurt feelings. I'm oft one to holler HEY! if something isn't right too. I'll say Hey now about Then again, deep breath to myself and be patient. This is an area where being older than 18 isn't required. Like Paul said near the beginning of these posts "Anyway - it's cool that you sorted it out between the two of you." Posted by: j.w. at February 17, 2004 03:02 AMHa, he is a dick! Posted by: never at February 17, 2004 05:35 AMThought I'd share a quote: "Asking programmers to make social software can be like asking deaf people to make violins" Originally copied from mamamusings, via AccordionGuy. Posted by: James at February 18, 2004 07:40 AMI apologize if I'm wrong but it seems like you post these things so your fanbase will gang up on the transgressor. Sometimes it seems to me that your ego gets in the way of an otherwise adequate talent for communication. Anything to help sell your books though, huh? Posted by: Brock at February 18, 2004 06:47 PMWaaaaa waaaaa waaaaa Posted by: Luke at February 19, 2004 01:00 AMWho knew Wil was a dick? I always knew he was a pussy, but never would I have guessed he was a dick too. That's got to be a first. Posted by: avoidinglife at February 21, 2004 05:55 AMActually, I've got to admit that when I read the article, I thought it was funny. I thought she was trying to be funny and good natured about it and I hadn't read it as having any negativey or hatred pointed towards you at all! And I thought the whole "dick" thing was just as she said in her apology to you. That it was poking fun at what YOU had said about yourself. Of course, it's really easy for ME to think it was all meant in fun since it wasn't about *me* :) I might not have been so unbiased about it had I been in your shoes reading an article about myself! But really, as an outsider reading it, I didn't think for a second that she had any malice towards you nor that she was trying to make you look bad at all in any way. Why would you care what I think? ;) No reason. I guess just in case you thought the average person out there who read the article might thing you were a bad person, I'd have to say that probably the opposite is true. Of COURSE you may miss the initial humor in something when it's about you, especially since you do have so many... what's a good word... "anti-fans"? ;) But I really think most people reading it would be able to see that the writer was genuinely trying to be funny and sarcastic. I didn't think it made you look bad nor did it look (to me) like the writer disliked you or was trying to disparage you in any way. Just my feedback/opinion (which nobody asked for! :) ) Posted by: Melissa at February 22, 2004 05:58 PMduder, i can't imagine a casting person passing you over because of a tongue-in-cheek article about your orkut friend-list. i'm not gonna lie, though: i think there's an implicit obligation involved with joining orkut or any of those friendster-style communities. you must be willing to play ball, in the spirit of the system. orkut was not designed for people who count their friends on one hand. this is why i am not an orkut member, and it is why i am not on friendster. and trust, you don't need procmail to screen spam. i have all my orkut/friendster/whateverster email go straight to my trash in my email client. i can't imagine that you order V1AGRA F0R CHE4P SKLFXJCZ! or REF1NANCE N0W 10015 WIL! just because you get lots of non-opt-outable emails about it. i love your blog, and i sympathize with the situation of being a well-known actor/blogger -- i can imagine your email box is deluged regularly. but i think if you don't want to be FRIENDZ-4-EVR with wilfan2003@yahoo.com on some social networking site, you ought to consider why you want to join a social networking site at all. join me, wil, in the elite few: the non-friendsters. optimus Posted by: optimus at February 22, 2004 11:26 PMI love Wil Wheaton and I am a super big fan of his and I would love to meet him in person in Star Fleet uniform and give him a very big hug. Posted by: Brian Vanmoerkerque at March 8, 2004 12:54 PMIt's never too late to write a letter of comment, that's my motto. Wil, I met Annalee in person for the first time this weekend at Baycon. I was interested in doing so because I love her writing and she interviewed me for an article she did about polyamory. Anyway, she mentioned her column about Orkut and you in passing --her tone in person was pretty much identical to the one in her letter you printed above-- and so I decided to go read the source materials (I managed to miss them both when the foofraw originally broke). My one comment is that I hope someday you and she will be able to sit on a panel about Open Source, the evils of social networking schemes like Orkut, or some other damn thing as you are both charming, intelligent, and witty. Posted by: RJ Johnson at May 31, 2004 10:36 PMPost a commentThanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out) (If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.) |
| ||||||||||||||||